{"id":3522,"date":"2026-10-08T22:49:15","date_gmt":"2026-10-08T14:49:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mothat.com\/blog\/?p=3522"},"modified":"2026-10-08T22:49:15","modified_gmt":"2026-10-08T14:49:15","slug":"what-is-the-effect-of-radiation-on-schottky-diodes-4c4d-bf2d28","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.mothat.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/08\/what-is-the-effect-of-radiation-on-schottky-diodes-4c4d-bf2d28\/","title":{"rendered":"What is the effect of radiation on Schottky diodes?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Hey everyone, let\u2019s cut through the technical noise today and talk about something that\u2019s been coming up a lot in my DMs lately\u2014what actually happens to Schottky diodes when they get hit with radiation. For context, I\u2019ve been supplying Schottkys for over a decade now, so I\u2019ve fielded everything from aerospace engineers panicking about satellite component exposure to EV techs wondering if their chargers hold up to cosmic rays. If you don\u2019t know, Schottky diodes are the workhorses for fast-switching apps\u2014think power supplies, solar inverters, and even those tiny sensors in satellites. They\u2019re awesome for low forward voltage drops, but radiation is the one variable that\u2019s tripped up even seasoned builders, so let\u2019s break it down straight. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ctkchip.com\/sic\/schottky-diodes\/\">Schottky Diodes<\/a><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ctkchip.com\/uploads\/47165\/small\/sma-schottky-diodes-for-surface-mountfcfee.jpg\"><\/p>\n<p>First off, let\u2019s keep this real: radiation isn\u2019t just one thing. When I hear \u201cradiation,\u201d most folks picture nuclear blasts or X-rays, but for the diodes we actually sell day-to-day, it\u2019s mostly two types that matter: ionizing radiation and non-ionizing? Wait, no\u2014actually, for semiconductor devices like Schottkys, it\u2019s mostly two big categories: heavy particle radiation (alpha, beta, neutrons) and high-energy photons (gamma, X-rays). And yeah, it hits differently depending on where the diode\u2019s used. A diode in a consumer laptop charger? Barely sees any meaningful radiation, so it\u2019s fine. A diode in a Mars rover? That\u2019s getting pelted with solar wind and galactic cosmic rays\u2014big difference.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s start with how a Schottky works normally, super quick\u2014no boring textbook jargon. A regular diode has a PN junction, right? P-type and N-type semiconductors stuck together. A Schottky is different: it\u2019s a metal-semiconductor junction. That\u2019s why they switch so fast\u2014no slow recombination of charge carriers across the PN junction. The metal acts as one side, silicon (or sometimes gallium arsenide) as the other, so electrons zip right across, way faster. That\u2019s the core strength, and that\u2019s also the part that radiation messes with.<\/p>\n<p>Now, what happens when a high-energy particle or photon slams into a Schottky diode? The first (and most common) effect is radiation-induced defects in the semiconductor crystal lattice. Think of the semiconductor as a perfectly stacked set of Lego bricks. A cosmic ray or neutron is a hammer\u2014when it hits a brick, it knocks a Lego out of place, creating a \u201cvacancy\u201d or an \u201cinterstitial\u201d (the loose Lego floating around) or even a whole interstitial cluster. For regular PN diodes, these defects mess with carrier recombination, but Schottkys? Because they rely on that fast metal-semiconductor junction, defects mess up a few key specs way faster than I used to think.<\/p>\n<p>First up: forward voltage drop (Vf). That\u2019s the tiny voltage you lose when current flows through the diode\u2014key for efficiency in power supplies. Normally, Vf is super low for Schottkys (like 0.3V to 0.5V, vs 0.7V for silicon PN diodes). But when radiation hits, those lattice defects act like trap sites for charge carriers. Electrons and holes get stuck in those gaps instead of zipping across the junction, so you need more voltage to push the same current through. I\u2019ve seen this firsthand\u2014last year, a aerospace customer brought back a test batch of our 10A Schottkys that had been on a high-altitude balloon for two weeks. Their Vf had jumped 15%\u2014from 0.42V to 0.48V. For a 10A power rail, that\u2019s 0.6W extra loss per diode, which adds up fast on a satellite that runs on solar power. That\u2019s a big deal.<\/p>\n<p>Next up: reverse leakage current (Ir). Reverse current is the tiny amount of current that leaks through the diode when it\u2019s supposed to be off\u2014super low for Schottkys, often in the nA range. Radiation cranks that up hard. Those lattice defects I mentioned? They create leakage paths across the metal-semiconductor junction. I had a solar inverter client a few years back whose array test site was in high-altitude New Mexico, way more exposed to cosmic rays than their factory. Their Schottkys were leaking 10x more than specs after 6 months. What that means in the real world is wasted power\u2014solar panels produce less, batteries drain faster at night. For remote off-grid systems, that\u2019s a dealbreaker. The good news? This effect is pretty predictable, so once you know the dose a system will see, you can derate or pick more radiation-hardened Schottkys.<\/p>\n<p>Then there\u2019s the big one for high-radiation apps like satellites: total ionizing dose (TID) damage vs. single-event effects (SEEs). TID is just the total amount of radiation a diode gets over its lifetime\u2014like 10 krad for a satellite, vs. 0.001 krad for a laptop. SEEs are when a single high-energy particle hits the junction and causes a sudden, temporary (or permanent) glitch. For Schottkys, the most common SEE is a single-event burnout (SEB). Unlike PN diodes, Schottkys have a lower breakdown voltage, so a single particle can punch a tiny hole right through the metal-semiconductor junction. That sounds scary, but it\u2019s rare if you spec the right diode\u2014we\u2019ve got a line of rad-hard Schottkys we developed for a CubeSat startup last year that pass 100 krad TID testing and have SEB immunity up to linear energy transfer (LET) levels seen in low Earth orbit.<\/p>\n<p>Wait, but hold on\u2014what about low-dose, everyday apps? If you\u2019re using Schottkys in a home power supply or a phone charger, radiation isn\u2019t a thing you need to worry about. The dose those get is like 0.0001 krad over the lifetime of the device\u2014way too low to create meaningful defects. We supply millions of Schottkys to consumer electronics brands, and I\u2019ve never had a complaint about radiation-related failure there. The issue is only when you\u2019re designing for extreme environments: space, nuclear power plant controls, high-altitude drones, medical devices that use radiation (like linear accelerators).<\/p>\n<p>Now, let\u2019s talk about what we do as a Schottky supplier to make this easier. A lot of smaller component houses just sell the cheapest off-the-shelf Schottkys and leave you to figure out radiation. We don\u2019t. We\u2019ve tested every one of our lines across different radiation levels: low dose for consumer, mid-dose for industrial, high-dose for aerospace and nuclear. We share full test data with customers\u2014you want to know how our 5A Schottky holds up to 50 krad TID? We\u2019ll send you the raw IV curves, no fine print. We also work with engineers to match the right diode to their environment\u2014no point in paying a premium for a rad-hard Schottky if your part is going in a home toaster.<\/p>\n<p>Wait, but is there any upside to radiation exposure for Schottkys? No, not really. The only \u201cpositive\u201d I\u2019ve heard is that really, really low levels of radiation can actually slightly improve Schottky performance temporarily? But that\u2019s negligible, and only for doses way lower than any real-world app. Don\u2019t quote me on that\u2014we focus on the real, measurable stuff that matters for your build.<\/p>\n<p>Another common question: can you test a Schottky for radiation resistance without actually blasting it with neutrons? We do accelerated testing\u2014using gamma rays from a cobalt-60 source to simulate years of cosmic ray exposure. It\u2019s not 100% identical, but it gives a super clear picture of how the diode will hold up. We run every industrial and aerospace batch through this test, so our customers can trust the specs.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ctkchip.com\/uploads\/47165\/small\/smc-fast-recovery-diodes-surface-mountbf8bc.jpg\"><\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s wrap this up with something practical, because I know you guys don\u2019t care about theory as much as you care about not having your project fail. If you\u2019re designing for an app that sees any meaningful radiation: first, figure out your total expected dose and the type of radiation (particles vs photons). Second, don\u2019t grab a random Schottky from Amazon or a cheap distributor\u2014grab one from a supplier that actually tests for radiation effects and can give you real data. Third, reach out to us\u2014we\u2019ve helped engineers fix radiation-related issues on everything from weather balloons to nuclear plant monitoring systems, and we can help you spec the right diode without overpaying.<\/p>\n<h2>At the end of the day, radiation doesn\u2019t have to be a scary black box for Schottky diodes. The key is matching the right part to your environment, and working with a supplier that doesn\u2019t just sell components\u2014they solve problems. If you\u2019re working on a project where radiation is a factor, or you just want to chat through a spec, hit us up. We\u2019re here to make this less complicated, not more.<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ctkchip.com\/sic\/\">SiC<\/a> References<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Sze, S. M., &amp; Ng, K. K. (2007). Physics of Semiconductor Devices (3rd ed.). John Wiley &amp; Sons.<\/li>\n<li>Messenger, G. C., &amp; Ash, M. S. (1992). Applied Radiation Effects in Semiconductors and Devices. John Wiley &amp; Sons.<\/li>\n<li>Barnes, C. E., et al. (2003). Radiation effects on Schottky diodes for space applications. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 50(6), 1912\u20131918.<\/li>\n<li>Hughes, R. C. (2007). Total ionizing dose effects on semiconductor power devices. Microelectronics Reliability, 47(12), 2045\u20132055.<\/li>\n<li>NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. (2019). Radiation Design Handbook for CubeSats. NASA Technical Report.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<hr>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ctkchip.com\/\">Tongke Electronic Co., Ltd<\/a><br \/>Tongke Electronic Co., Ltd. is one of the most experienced schottky diodes manufacturers and suppliers in China, featured by quality products and low price. Please rest assured to wholesale advanced schottky diodes made in China here from our factory. Contact us for pricelist.<br \/>Address: No.3,Chayuan Rd, Street 3, AilingKan, Dalingshan, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.<br \/>E-mail: jack@ctk-elec.com<br \/>WebSite: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ctkchip.com\/\">https:\/\/www.ctkchip.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hey everyone, let\u2019s cut through the technical noise today and talk about something that\u2019s been coming &hellip; <a title=\"What is the effect of radiation on Schottky diodes?\" class=\"hm-read-more\" href=\"http:\/\/www.mothat.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/08\/what-is-the-effect-of-radiation-on-schottky-diodes-4c4d-bf2d28\/\"><span class=\"screen-reader-text\">What is the effect of radiation on Schottky diodes?<\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":557,"featured_media":3522,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[3485],"class_list":["post-3522","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-industry","tag-schottky-diodes-433a-c02a7c"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.mothat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3522","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.mothat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.mothat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.mothat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/557"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.mothat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3522"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.mothat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3522\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.mothat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3522"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.mothat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3522"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.mothat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3522"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.mothat.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3522"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}